Subscribe to this page via e-mail here - Subscribe
0215
Began July 19 at Friendship, near Ashland, Mississippi.
Mr. Whitehurst affirmed: "The scriptures teach that infants are proper subjects for Christian baptism." He used Exodus 14:19-26; Acts 16:14-15; Matthew 19:13-15 and used the usual arguments for his infant baptism theory. Bro. Craig called his attention to I Corinthians 10:1-2; that Paul said it was the fathers that were baptized, not infants; that in the case of Lydia he assumed the very thing he was to prove; that Matthew 19:13-15 did not even remotely refer to infant baptism.
Bro. Craig affirmed for one day: "The scriptures teach that water baptism to a penitent believer is for, in order to, the remission of past sins." He showed in every conversion that baptism was necessary; that it stands between the sinner and salvation; that the remission off sins and gift of the Holy Spirit always comes after baptism. Mr. Whitehurst tried in vain to overthrow these facts. Mr. Whitehurst is above average for a debate. After second day he asked that the debate be closed. So the Methodist cause went down in defeat.
VIEW NEXT REPORT >>
Print
Dan P. Craig (Walnut, Mississippi) vs B. G. Whitehurst (Methodist) (Coldwater, Mississippi)
September 28, 1933)
near Ashland, Mississippi
September 28, 1933)
near Ashland, Mississippi
Began July 19 at Friendship, near Ashland, Mississippi.
Mr. Whitehurst affirmed: "The scriptures teach that infants are proper subjects for Christian baptism." He used Exodus 14:19-26; Acts 16:14-15; Matthew 19:13-15 and used the usual arguments for his infant baptism theory. Bro. Craig called his attention to I Corinthians 10:1-2; that Paul said it was the fathers that were baptized, not infants; that in the case of Lydia he assumed the very thing he was to prove; that Matthew 19:13-15 did not even remotely refer to infant baptism.
Bro. Craig affirmed for one day: "The scriptures teach that water baptism to a penitent believer is for, in order to, the remission of past sins." He showed in every conversion that baptism was necessary; that it stands between the sinner and salvation; that the remission off sins and gift of the Holy Spirit always comes after baptism. Mr. Whitehurst tried in vain to overthrow these facts. Mr. Whitehurst is above average for a debate. After second day he asked that the debate be closed. So the Methodist cause went down in defeat.
VIEW NEXT REPORT >>
| Powered By |
| TheLordsWay.com |
| Click here to host your own church web site today! |
