Opposition to Real Salvation
The Plan of Salvation, Negatively Viewed One way to learn a truth or subject is to establish the negative, what it is not. For instance, one way in which James treats the subject of saving faith is to show what saving faith is not (Jas. 2: 15-20, James also presents the positive, what saving faith is, vs. 21-26). Salvation is clearly set forth in the scriptures as requiring man's humble obedience and participation (Acts 2: 37-41, Tit. 2: 11-14). Salvation is not the result of an after thought on the part of God, but is the product of much planning (I Pet. 1: 9, 10, vs. 2, Eph. 1: 4, Matt. 25: 34). Hence, the expression "plan of salvation" is a scriptural concept. Let us now turn our attention to what God's plan for the salvation of man is not. The means of entering a denomination. Some believe that the plan of salvation is a means of entering a man made religion. The closest we can come to modern day denominationalism in the scriptures is I Corinthians 1: 10-13. However, the principle of denominationalism is condemned in this passage. In the First Century, there was only one church, the Lord's church (Matt. 16: 18, Eph. 4: 4, compare with Eph. 1: 22, 23). When men and women "obeyed the gospel," they were added by the Lord to his church (Acts 2: 47, KJV, I Cor. 12: 13, Gal. 3: 26, 27). If God did add man to a denomination today, which one would it be of the thousands? The plan of salvation is not a system whereby man merits salvation. The scriptures offer no doubt as to the possibility of man meriting salvation, he simply cannot (Tit. 3: 5, Eph. 2: 8, 9, Rom. 11: 6). If man could merit and earn salvation, Jesus' coming and death would have all been unnecessary. However, without Jesus' death, man, all men, would have been helplessly doomed to an eternity in hell (Rom. 5: 6-10). It is not a plan of relativity. It is true that the gospel is for all, regardless of race, gender, and place in life (Mk. 16: 15, 16). However, salvation is not relative in the sense that it is different for every person (Acts 2: 14-47). The same person (Jesus) and the same plan of salvation applies to one and all (Rom. 1: 16, Acts 8: 35ff.). All responsible men must believe, repent, confess Christ's deity, and be baptized for the remission of sin, no exception (Jn. 8: 24; Acts 17: 30, 31; Rom. 10: 9, 10; Acts 2: 38). The plan of salvation is not a process of subjectivism. So many use the criterion of, "I know I am saved because I feel saved." Paul said in referring to the time that included his persecution of Christians, "I verily thought with myself, that I ought to do many things contrary to the name of Jesus of Nazareth" (Acts 26: 9). The Wise Man wrote, "He that trustheth in his own heart is a fool: but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered" (Prov. 28: 26). One reason we have so many divergent "plans of salvation" is because people are looking to subjectivism (their personal feelings) and not objectively considering the matter (teaching of the Bible). Emotions are important and vital, but emotion alone is not the answer (Rom. 6: 17, 18). Not a national, theocratic matter. The Law of Moses was a theocracy or combination of religion and civil government (Ex. 20-21). This is why Israel as a State was able to implement capital punishment. The Law of Moses was, for the most part, peculiar to the Nation of Israel (Duet 5: 1-3). However, the gospel that contains God's plan of salvation is for all races and all men (Matt. 28: 19). Peter said, "Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: but in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him" (Acts 10: 34, 35). It is not a robotic, simply intellectual experience. While the plan of salvation appeals to the mind of man, it is not cold intellectualism. There was emotion associated with becoming a Christian in the First Century (Acts 2: 41, KJV, 8: 26-40). The happy balance between the intell
Print
The Plan of Salvation, Negatively Viewed One way to learn a truth or subject is to establish the negative, what it is not. For instance, one way in which James treats the subject of saving faith is to show what saving faith is not (Jas. 2: 15-20, James also presents the positive, what saving faith is, vs. 21-26). Salvation is clearly set forth in the scriptures as requiring man's humble obedience and participation (Acts 2: 37-41, Tit. 2: 11-14). Salvation is not the result of an after thought on the part of God, but is the product of much planning (I Pet. 1: 9, 10, vs. 2, Eph. 1: 4, Matt. 25: 34). Hence, the expression "plan of salvation" is a scriptural concept. Let us now turn our attention to what God's plan for the salvation of man is not. The means of entering a denomination. Some believe that the plan of salvation is a means of entering a man made religion. The closest we can come to modern day denominationalism in the scriptures is I Corinthians 1: 10-13. However, the principle of denominationalism is condemned in this passage. In the First Century, there was only one church, the Lord's church (Matt. 16: 18, Eph. 4: 4, compare with Eph. 1: 22, 23). When men and women "obeyed the gospel," they were added by the Lord to his church (Acts 2: 47, KJV, I Cor. 12: 13, Gal. 3: 26, 27). If God did add man to a denomination today, which one would it be of the thousands? The plan of salvation is not a system whereby man merits salvation. The scriptures offer no doubt as to the possibility of man meriting salvation, he simply cannot (Tit. 3: 5, Eph. 2: 8, 9, Rom. 11: 6). If man could merit and earn salvation, Jesus' coming and death would have all been unnecessary. However, without Jesus' death, man, all men, would have been helplessly doomed to an eternity in hell (Rom. 5: 6-10). It is not a plan of relativity. It is true that the gospel is for all, regardless of race, gender, and place in life (Mk. 16: 15, 16). However, salvation is not relative in the sense that it is different for every person (Acts 2: 14-47). The same person (Jesus) and the same plan of salvation applies to one and all (Rom. 1: 16, Acts 8: 35ff.). All responsible men must believe, repent, confess Christ's deity, and be baptized for the remission of sin, no exception (Jn. 8: 24; Acts 17: 30, 31; Rom. 10: 9, 10; Acts 2: 38). The plan of salvation is not a process of subjectivism. So many use the criterion of, "I know I am saved because I feel saved." Paul said in referring to the time that included his persecution of Christians, "I verily thought with myself, that I ought to do many things contrary to the name of Jesus of Nazareth" (Acts 26: 9). The Wise Man wrote, "He that trustheth in his own heart is a fool: but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered" (Prov. 28: 26). One reason we have so many divergent "plans of salvation" is because people are looking to subjectivism (their personal feelings) and not objectively considering the matter (teaching of the Bible). Emotions are important and vital, but emotion alone is not the answer (Rom. 6: 17, 18). Not a national, theocratic matter. The Law of Moses was a theocracy or combination of religion and civil government (Ex. 20-21). This is why Israel as a State was able to implement capital punishment. The Law of Moses was, for the most part, peculiar to the Nation of Israel (Duet 5: 1-3). However, the gospel that contains God's plan of salvation is for all races and all men (Matt. 28: 19). Peter said, "Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: but in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him" (Acts 10: 34, 35). It is not a robotic, simply intellectual experience. While the plan of salvation appeals to the mind of man, it is not cold intellectualism. There was emotion associated with becoming a Christian in the First Century (Acts 2: 41, KJV, 8: 26-40). The happy balance between the intell
Isaac Sandifer Jr.
Cleophas Reaves Jr.
